Compression After Impact

Presenter(s)

Wyatt Laborde and  Michael Dietz

Abstract

This Is the second part of our project. Last year, we manufactured fiberglass panels that were 12 layers thick and would eventually be 6" by 4". This year, we completed the second half of our testing by first cutting the panels square to be as close to 4" by 6" as possible. Then, before testing could be started, the damage types and diameter were measured. This is measured because it helps when examining the type of failure the panel endures. Then, testing could be started. The panels were placed in the housing and fitted so they could move up and down but not side to side. This allows the part to flex throughout testing. Then the top is placed on, and it is fitted in the center of the testing platform. The thickness, height, and width of the pieces were input to the machine, and then the test began. Each part was tested until there was a fracture in the piece or the top and bottom housing touched. At this point, it was stopped because the metal was then being tested. After each run, the specimen was photographed and put to the side. After all testing was completed, the data was compiled and examined to see how the panel's compressive strength was affected by the amount of force impact in the first step of testing.

College

College of Science & Engineering

Department

Composite Materials Engineering

Campus

Winona

First Advisor/Mentor

Eric Kerr-Anderson

Location

Kryzsko Great River Ballroom, Winona, Minnesota; United States

Start Date

4-23-2026 10:00 AM

End Date

4-23-2026 11:00 AM

Presentation Type

Poster Session

Format of Presentation or Performance

In-Person

Session

1b=10am-11am

Poster Number

44

Comments

Laborde, Wyatt N; Dietz, Michael A

Share

COinS
 
Apr 23rd, 10:00 AM Apr 23rd, 11:00 AM

Compression After Impact

Kryzsko Great River Ballroom, Winona, Minnesota; United States

This Is the second part of our project. Last year, we manufactured fiberglass panels that were 12 layers thick and would eventually be 6" by 4". This year, we completed the second half of our testing by first cutting the panels square to be as close to 4" by 6" as possible. Then, before testing could be started, the damage types and diameter were measured. This is measured because it helps when examining the type of failure the panel endures. Then, testing could be started. The panels were placed in the housing and fitted so they could move up and down but not side to side. This allows the part to flex throughout testing. Then the top is placed on, and it is fitted in the center of the testing platform. The thickness, height, and width of the pieces were input to the machine, and then the test began. Each part was tested until there was a fracture in the piece or the top and bottom housing touched. At this point, it was stopped because the metal was then being tested. After each run, the specimen was photographed and put to the side. After all testing was completed, the data was compiled and examined to see how the panel's compressive strength was affected by the amount of force impact in the first step of testing.