Abstract
The rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has reshaped teaching, learning, research, and administrative work across higher education. To better understand how campus communities are engaging with AI, this study examines the perspectives and practices of faculty, staff, and students at a regional comprehensive university in Minnesota. Drawing on survey data from 143 respondents, the study explores patterns of AI usage, perceived benefits and challenges, and the training needs required for ethical and effective integration of AI tools. Findings indicate that students primarily use AI for tutoring, idea generation, and drafting written assignments; faculty rely on AI for research, assessment creation, and instructional support; and staff employ AI to increase efficiency in administrative tasks and communication. Across groups, participants expressed both optimism about AI’s potential and concern regarding its ethical implications, including academic integrity, data privacy, and over-reliance on automated systems. Results highlight the need for targeted professional development, improved digital literacy, and clear institutional guidelines to support responsible use. The study concludes by offering recommendations for strengthening AI readiness across campus through intentional training and collaborative learning. These insights contribute to broader conversations on how higher education can leverage AI to enhance equity, creativity, and student success while maintaining human-centered academic values.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education; Generative AI; AI Literacy; Ethical AI Use; Teaching and Learning; Faculty and Student Perspectives; Professional Development
Recommended Citation
Bordoloi, Sudarshana Dr. and Burk, Brooke
(2026)
"Understanding AI Usage on Campus: Perspectives of Faculty, Staff, and Students at a Regional Comprehensive Institution,"
Essays in Education: Vol. 32:
Iss.
1, Article 13.
Available at:
https://openriver.winona.edu/eie/vol32/iss1/13
Included in
Adult and Continuing Education Commons, Educational Technology Commons, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Commons
