Differences in Positional Demands for a Collegiate American Football Team During In-Season Practices
Presenter(s)
Lucas Crouse, Brady Ferguson, and Logan Stauffer
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study analyzes the differences in positional group (PG) demands for a collegiate American football team during in-season practices (P). Previous research shows that skill PG cover more distance (D), run faster, and have greater acceleration loads than non-skill PG. Understanding these differences can optimize training and injury prevention.
METHODS: Eighteen 10 Hertz Global Positioning System (GPS) trackers were assigned to 7 PG: wide receiver (WR) (n=4), running back (RB) (n=2), tight end (TE) (n=2), cornerback (CB) (n=2), safety (S) (n=2), linebacker (LB) (n=4), and defensive linemen (DL) (n=2). External load metrics including D, sprint distance (SP), and distance/minute (DPM) were tracked and exported to a customized spreadsheet. SP/min, %SP, and SP/P, were then calculated. SPSS was utilized to calculate descriptive statistics for each PG and a Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to assess differences in load metrics with a statistical significance value of p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Group means ± SD are shown below. No significant differences across PG were found for SD (p=0.063), DPM (p=0.234), %SP (p=0.12), SP/P (p=0.09), and SP/min (p=0.08).
CONCLUSION: The results provide insight into the external load demands of different PG in American football. Strength and conditioning coaches can use this information to tailor training programs that better prepare each PG for the physical demands of the season.
College
College of Nursing & Health Sciences
Department
Health, Exercise & Rehabilitative Sciences
Campus
Winona
First Advisor/Mentor
Becky Heinert
Start Date
5-1-2025 9:00 AM
End Date
4-24-2025 10:00 AM
Presentation Type
Poster Session
Format of Presentation or Performance
In-Person
Session
1a=9am-10am
Poster Number
27
Differences in Positional Demands for a Collegiate American Football Team During In-Season Practices
PURPOSE: This study analyzes the differences in positional group (PG) demands for a collegiate American football team during in-season practices (P). Previous research shows that skill PG cover more distance (D), run faster, and have greater acceleration loads than non-skill PG. Understanding these differences can optimize training and injury prevention.
METHODS: Eighteen 10 Hertz Global Positioning System (GPS) trackers were assigned to 7 PG: wide receiver (WR) (n=4), running back (RB) (n=2), tight end (TE) (n=2), cornerback (CB) (n=2), safety (S) (n=2), linebacker (LB) (n=4), and defensive linemen (DL) (n=2). External load metrics including D, sprint distance (SP), and distance/minute (DPM) were tracked and exported to a customized spreadsheet. SP/min, %SP, and SP/P, were then calculated. SPSS was utilized to calculate descriptive statistics for each PG and a Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to assess differences in load metrics with a statistical significance value of p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Group means ± SD are shown below. No significant differences across PG were found for SD (p=0.063), DPM (p=0.234), %SP (p=0.12), SP/P (p=0.09), and SP/min (p=0.08).
CONCLUSION: The results provide insight into the external load demands of different PG in American football. Strength and conditioning coaches can use this information to tailor training programs that better prepare each PG for the physical demands of the season.
Comments
WSU Review Needed